Search Help

Enter one of more keywords to search. Use quotes for “exact phrase.” Note that '*' and '?' wildcards are supported.

When your search results appear, you can refine your search further: Sort for only results in which all search terms appear AND/OR sort by chronological order.

Article Date:
December 2007

Word Count:



Commissioned Employees Beat AMT by Claiming Independent Contractor Status

Employees get the short end of the stick when it comes to business expenses. Why? The alternative minimum tax (AMT) does not allow a tax deduction for employee business expenses.


The AMT is one result of the big 1986 tax reform, in which lawmakers put one over on the American people. The big selling point in 1986 was that the top tax rate would be only 28% and that, in effect, the new law would produce a type of flat tax with only two brackets, 28% and 15%. The word on Capitol Hill at the time was that you could get the American public to buy “any type of tax” if the top rate was less than 30%.


The AMT is one perfectly unfair “any type of tax.” It has one simple purpose: to tax what the regular tax allows as deductions. Is this stupid or what? After all, if lawmakers do not want taxpayers to deduct certain expenses, why allow those expenses in the first place?


The employee business expense AMT debacle affects all employees who pay their own expenses, including many



insurance sales professionals,


real estate sales professionals,


traveling sales professionals,


emergency room physicians,


mortgage brokers and bankers, and



When the AMT nails these employees, they pay thousands more ... Log in to view full article.

Already a subscriber?
Email Address

You’ll be able to read the full article and get instant access to the last few issues of the Tax Reduction Letter
Not yet a subscriber?
with a money-back guarantee

Powered by Cranium Softworks - CMS, Subscription Mgmt & Web Development