Search Help

Enter one of more keywords to search. Use quotes for “exact phrase.” Note that '*' and '?' wildcards are supported.

When your search results appear, you can refine your search further: Sort for only results in which all search terms appear AND/OR sort by chronological order.

Article Date:
December 2006

Word Count:



Poor Arguments Cause Demise of Home-Office Deduction

Curtis Muhammad appears to have lost his home-office deduction because he poorly framed his arguments for the court. Looking at the facts of the case, the court first stated that Muhammad, a financial advisor, did not meet prospects or clients in his home; therefore, he could, said the court, get a home-office deduction only if he used the home office as his principal place of business.


Neither Muhammad nor the court addressed the home-office rule found in section 280A(c)(a) that ... Log in to view full article.

Already a subscriber?
Email Address

You’ll be able to read the full article and get instant access to the last few issues of the Tax Reduction Letter
Not yet a subscriber?
with a money-back guarantee

Powered by Cranium Softworks - CMS, Subscription Mgmt & Web Development