Search Help


Enter one of more keywords to search. Use quotes for “exact phrase.” Note that '*' and '?' wildcards are supported.

When your search results appear, you can refine your search further: Sort for only results in which all search terms appear AND/OR sort by chronological order.

Article Date:
December 2006


Word Count:
409

 

 

Poor Arguments Cause Demise of Home-Office Deduction


Curtis Muhammad appears to have lost his home-office deduction because he poorly framed his arguments for the court. Looking at the facts of the case, the court first stated that Muhammad, a financial advisor, did not meet prospects or clients in his home; therefore, he could, said the court, get a home-office deduction only if he used the home office as his principal place of business.

 

Neither Muhammad nor the court addressed the home-office rule found in section 280A(c)(a) that ... Log in to view full article.

Log in to view full article
Already a subscriber?
 
Email Address

 
Password

Log In Send me my password

You'll be able to read the full article and get instant access to the last few issues of the Tax Reduction Letter

Not yet a subscriber?
 
with a money-back guarantee



 

SS